Nationwide slam congress day
Protecting the Bill of Rights
The American form of government (Video)
When our Constitution was first established, it was assumed that the description of specific powers granted to the government would leave no doubt as to what the government could and could not do, and that the absence of powers over the rights of the people would leave those rights protected. But Jefferson and others were wary of leaving such important matters up to inference. They insisted on a Bill of Rights that would state in unmistakable terms those rights of the people that must be left inviolate.
James Madison is considered the most influential contributor to the United States Constitution, and he worked vigorously to see it ratified. On June 8, 1789, he introduced his proposed amendments to the Constitution, which would eventually become known as the Bill of Rights.  Supporters of the Constitution called themselves Federalists and labeled their opponents as Antifederalists. The Antifederalists attacked the Constitution on several grounds. They first objected to the absence of a bill of rights. Several states had adopted written guarantees of the rights of citizens to ensure that the government would not destroy the liberty of the people. A bill of rights would assert the freedoms of speech, assembly, and religion, and maintain the protection of property and due process of law and the right to keep and bear arms. Antifederalists feared that the new, strong central government could too easily threaten these rights and be unchecked by the states.
Madison debated on June 6, 1789 Amendments to the Constitution, page 449: “We ought not to disregard their inclination, but, on principles of amity and moderation, conform to their wishes, and expressly declare the great rights of mankind secured under this constitution”.  
On page 450: “I know some respectable characters who opposed this Government on these grounds; but I believe that the great mass of the people who opposed it, dislike it because it did not contain effectual provision against encroachments on particular rights, and those safeguards which they have been long accustomed to have interposed between them and the magistrate who exercises the sovereign power; nor ought we to consider them safe, while a great number of our fellow citizens think these securities necessary.”
On page 459: “I should advocate greater dispatch in the business of amendments, if I were not convinced of the absolute necessity there is of pursuing the organization of the Government; because I think we should obtain the confidence of out fellow-citizens, in proportion as we fortify the rights of the people against the encroachments of the Government”.
"A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular; and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inferences." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1787. ME 6:388, Papers 12:440

"A constitutive act may, certainly, be so formed as to need no declaration of rights. The act itself has the force of a declaration as far as it goes; and if it goes to all material points, nothing more is wanting... But in a constitutive act which leaves some precious articles unnoticed and raises implications against others, a declaration of rights becomes necessary by way of supplement. This is the case of our new Federal Constitution. This instrument forms us into one State as to certain objects and gives us a legislative and executive body for these objects. It should therefore guard against their abuses of power within the field submitted to them." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1789. ME 7:310

On September 25, 1789, the First Federal Congress of the United States proposed to the state legislatures twelve amendments to the Constitution. The first two, concerning the number of constituents for each Representative and the compensation of Congressmen, were not ratified.* Articles three through twelve, known as the Bill of Rights, became the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution and contained guarantees of essential rights and liberties omitted in the crafting of the original document.

Effective December 15, 1791
Articles in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

The First 10 Amendments to the Constitution as Ratified by the States December 15, 1791
Congress OF THE United States begun and held at the City of New York, on Wednesday the Fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.:
ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
Note: The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the "Bill of Rights."

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The Bill of Rights is a “No Trespassing” sign meant for you (govenment), not for those of us (the People) you have falsely sworn to serve.

One Hundred Seventy-five Years Later
Congress claims that the amendments can be changed by the will of the people. By this line of reasoning the amendments are open to interpretation. This is a clever deception: The political manipulation of language, by obfuscation, e.g. WAR IS PEACE. Using language to obfuscate meaning or to reduce and eliminate ideas and their meanings that are deemed dangerous to its authority.
The Bill of Rights is separate from the other amendments. The Bill of Rights is a declaration of restrictions from Government encroaching on Natural and Inalienable Rights. The Constitution restricts the powers of government. The deception is that the government can interpret all of the amendments and the Constitution itself by obfuscation have been affected by the Orwellian strategies.
The Gun Control Act of 1968

Senator Thomas Joseph Dodd: Dodd was elected as a Democrat to the House of Representatives in 1952, and served two terms. He lost a Senate election in 1956 to Prescott S. Bush, but was elected in 1958 to Connecticut's other Senate seat and then re-elected in 1964.
Before becoming a U.S. senator, Dodd was hired to lobby for Guatemala in the United States for $50,000 a year by Guatemalan dictator Carlos Castillo Armas. According to the North American Congress on Latin America, Dodd "had perhaps the coziest relationship with the Castillo Armas government." After a short trip to Guatemala in 1955, Dodd urged the House of Representatives to increase aid to the Central American country. Dodd's amendment passed and Guatemala received 15 million dollars of US aid in 1956.[17]
As chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency, Dodd worked to restrict the purchase of mail order handguns, and later shotguns and rifles. These efforts culminated in the Gun Control Act of 1968, which Dodd introduced.

“GUN CONTROL” Gateway to Tyranny
Recently, with the discovery and publication of a letter from the Library of Congress to Senator Dodd from July 1968 confirming his request to have a series of Nazi laws translated from documents provided by Senator Dodd, controversy has arisen as to how much of the Gun Control Act of 1968 was taken directly from gun registration laws enacted and enforced by the Nazis in Germany and areas under Nazi control. It is believed that Senator Dodd obtained copies of the Nazi laws while serving as a prosecutor at Nuremberg.
The Gun Control Act of 1968, Pub. L. No. 90-618, 82 Stat. 1213 (also known as GCA or GCA68, and codified as Chapter 44 of Title 18, United States Code) is a federal law in the United States that broadly regulates the firearms industry and firearms owners. It primarily focuses on regulating interstate commerce in firearms by generally prohibiting interstate firearms transfers except among licensed manufacturers, dealers and importers.

Must Read!
This little-known U.S. Senate report is potent ammo for all gun owners interested in the preservation of our right to keep and bear arms. It is proof that the U.S. government itself has studied the meaning of the Second Amendment from all perspectives and concluded that every private citizen has the individual right to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner.

DICK ACT of 1902... CAN'T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) - Protection Against Tyrannical Government.


Acts Repugnant to the Second Amendment under The Gun Control Act of 1968
Laws that are Roots to Tyarnny

Under the GCA, firearms possession by certain categories of individuals is prohibited.
1.  Anyone who has been convicted in a federal court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, excluding crimes of imprisonment that are related to the regulation of business practices.
2.  Anyone who has been convicted in a state court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 2 years, excluding crimes of imprisonment that are related to the regulation of business practices.
3.  Anyone who is a fugitive from justice.
4.  Anyone who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.
5.  Anyone who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to a mental institution.
6.  Any alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States or an alien admitted to the United States under a nonimmigrant visa.
7.  Anyone who has been discharged from the US Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions.
8.  Anyone who, having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his or her citizenship.
9.  Anyone that is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner.
10. Anyone who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence (added in 1996. The most repugnant and hated gun ban law ever introduced into law to the Second Amendment).
Additionally, 18 USC 922(x) generally prohibits persons under 18 from possessing handguns or handgun ammunition with certain exceptions for employment, target practice, education, and a handgun possessed while defending the home of the juvenile or a home in which they are an invited guest.


A government that does not trust it's law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is itself unworthy of trust”.  James Madison

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
-- George Washington

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

What part of `infringed' does the Government not understand?

Infringed: infringe Verb
[-fringing, -fringed]
1. to violate or break (a law or agreement)
2. infringe on or upon to encroach or trespass on: the press infringed on their privacy [Latin infringere to break off]
infringement n

infringe - go against, as of rules and laws; "He ran afoul of the law"; "This behavior conflicts with our rules" contravene, run afoul, conflict breach, infract, transgress, violate, go against, offend, break - act in disregard of laws, rules, contracts, or promises; "offend all laws of humanity"; "violate the basic laws or human civilization"; "break a law"; "break a promise"
infringe - advance beyond the usual limit encroach, impinge


THE BILL OF RIGHTS --- Void where prohibited by law"

"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid.  It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents.  A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law.
If there should happen to be an irreconcilable variance between the  two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." (A.Hamilton, Federalist Papers #78 See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762,  Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)

      "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."
Marbury vs. Madison

      "It cannot be presumed that any clause in the Constitution is intended to be without effect..." - Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, 1803

      "Prohibition goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation and makes crimes out of things that are not crimes.  A prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded." - Abraham Lincoln

      "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona

      "When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and no one is bound to obey it." - State v. Sutton 63 Minn 167, 65 NW 262, 30 LRA 630

      "Constitutional rights may not be infringed simply because the majority of the people choose that they be." - Westbrook v. Mihaly 2 C3d 756

      "Under our form of government, the legislature is not other departments of government, it can only exercise such powers as have been delegated to it, and when it steps beyond that boundary, its acts, like those of the most humble magistrate in the state who transcends his jurisdiction, are utterly void." - Billings v. Hall 7 CA 1

      "If the legislature clearly misinterprets a Constitutional provision, the frequent repetition of the wrong will not create a right." Amos v. Mosley, 77 SO 619.  Also see Kingsley v. Metril, 99 NW 1044

      "Where the meaning of the  Constitution is clear and unambiguous, there can be no resort to construction to attribute to the founders a purpose or intent NOT MANIFEST IN ITS LETTER." Norris v. Baltimore 192 A 531

      "An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County, 118 US 425 p.442

      "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it."

      "No on is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it." 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177, late 2d, Sec 256

      "We find it intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another." - Simmons v. US, 390 US 389 (1968)

Constitution Requirement
 Article. VI. Clause 3
 The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
United States Code Title 5 Sec. 3331. Oath of office
     An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: ''I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.  So help me God.'' This section does not affect other oaths required by Law.

Before an elected or appointed individual can enter upon the duties of the respective office, the elected or appointed individual must take the Constitutional Requirement oath. After taking the said Constitutional Requirement oath, that elected or appointed individual is now official. The same elected or appointed individual after taking the Constitutional Requirement oath, is now acting under Color of Law and Color of Office.

The biggest crime committed today against the Constitution

Did you know that the biggest crime committed today against the Constitution and the inalienable rights of the people of the United States of America: Is from our government's violation of The Oath of Office?  An oath of office is an oath or affirmation a person takes before undertaking the duties of an office, usually a position in government. Such oaths are often required by the laws of the state, before the person may actually exercise the powers of the office they have been elected, or appointed.

My name is Gary De Capua and founder of the Civil Rights Task Force in Nevada. It is a fact that little is known about the Office of Public Trust: The Oath of Office. On my web site it explains the relevant issues of why it is needed to make the Oath of Office a relevant issue. The Constitution requirement of Article 6; Section 3 is inherently Supreme in nature which makes it a very powerful tool. Operation Link Up and why it is very important that we link up all patriot groups and concern citizens to inform them that when our elected officials take the Oath of Office, they have sworn to and are bound to protect and defend the Constitution, they have attested their names to that very “Oath” and that it is their first line of duty, to protect and defend the Bill of Rights, and if they don't, then it is time to boot them out of the 'Office of Public Trust'. We the 'People' still have the power to Boot them, Kick them all out and FIRE THEM, when it comes time at the voting booth.
Some oaths of office are a statement of loyalty to a constitution or other legal text or to a person or other office-holder (e.g., an oath to support the constitution of the state, or of loyalty to the king). Under the laws of a state it may be considered treason or a high crime to betray a sworn oath of office.
Treason ? What's that ?


CIVIL RIGHTS TASK FORCE                  

 YOU'RE FIRE.COM             

The enemy within government is more of a threat than any terrorist organization or Foreign nation. Treason is as subtle as public officials refusing to support and defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights by violating the contract, by which all government officials, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation.
An Open Letter to All American
Politicians and Bureaucrats
To: Members of Congress and Appointed Bureaucrats.
From Aaron Zelman – Founder and Director of
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.
The Bill of Rights is a “No Trespassing” sign meant for you, not for those of us you have falsely sworn to serve.
Please pass the "Open Letter to All American Politicians and Bureaucrats" around to all and get involved in Operation Oath....


Most importantly, we must all come together as citizens concerned with the future of the United States.

 OPERATIONLINK-UP: and the relevant reasons behind it.

The enemy within government is more of a threat than any terrorist organization or Foreign nation. Treason is as subtle as public officials refusing to support and defend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights by violating the contract, by which all government officials, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation.
Our mission is simple; we must stand together as concerned citizens on a Constitutional requirement, willing to defend those inalienable and Natural rights which are guaranteed by the Constitution, to hold all federal, state officers, city and county officers that swear to an oath of office and bound to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and their State Constitution and the laws, accountable for misconstruction or abuse of its powers.
Liberty: The final boundary, these are the journeys of the Bill of Rights Task Force. Its mission, to explore misconstruction or abuse of powers, to seek out new interest and new inhabitants, to boldly go where no decree has gone before.
Our country is heading in the wrong direction. Our Bill of Rights is being violated in serious ways and there is a lack of concern by "Contemporary Citizen". In fact a majority of Americans (including Christians and conservatives) seem oblivious to this relevant issue. Is it because they care not to understand the pertinent issues on the Oath of Office? Or is it because most Americans are totally unaware of this Constitutional requirement? Or have we become A NATION OF SHEEP. Or is it because we have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving? Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, and school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why? Our foundational freedoms are taken for granted, abused, trampled, and disregarded on a daily basis by government officials that will violate the Constitutional requirement; the Oath of Office.

Our Constitution is not being enforced or upheld by those who have sworn and are BOUND to uphold it while in the office of public trust. We need to take back control from rogue government officials who are abusing their delegated powers to re-interpret this hallowed "Supreme Law of the Land" and with cooperating help from rogue courts. Recent alarming events include the Lautenberg gun ban, the new Patriot Act, many Federal Income Tax laws, just to mention a few. When first enacted, the Constitution was a milestone in the history of mankind ~ even though many founding fathers realized that
Amendments would be required.

The first ten such amendments have become known as our Bill of Rights. Their primary significance is that they guarantee the continuing existence of our basic American liberties for all generations ~ not to be violated and defied by government officials. They were enacted on January 18, 1790 in this context:
"And be it further enacted, that in as much as the Constitution of the United States and the organic act of said territory has secured to the inhabitants there of certain inalienable rights, of which they can not be deprived by any legislative enactment …"

An American public servant who trespasses outside the bounds of his/her Oath of Office is being disloyal toward their country.

“Why otherwise does it direct the judges to take an oath to support it? This oath certainly applies in an especial manner to their conduct in their official character.” JUSTICE MARSHALL Marbury v. Madison 5 US (1 Cranch) 137; 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803)

“To prescribe, or take this oath, becomes equally a crime.” Marbury v. Madison

We must make the Constitution requirement a relevant Issue by linking up to other American Patriot web sites, official government sites, bloggers, and by emailing this letter to friends and family that care about America.

Thomas Paine said in 1777, "Those who expect to reap the blessing of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."

We can do it if we mass together for a common cause. United we stand, divided we fall.

"In order to accomplish the impossible, we must attempt the absurd."

We The People are Mad as Hell

We, the People, are Mad as Hell when elected or appointed officials relinquish the Constitution for the accommodation of passing repugnant laws for special interest and relinquishing the guarantee protected rights, a right inestimable to them for the tolerance of tyranny.

We, the people, of the United States of America are Mad as Hell over the direction our great country has taken. We do not want a socialist government running the greatest country on earth. However, there have been many indications, as of late, that this is the case.

We, the People, are Mad as Hell will not stand for deviation from the values instilled by the Founding Fathers: The Constitution of the United States, the very document you took the Constitutional required oath to uphold.  “We, the people” ultimately have the final say in how our country is run.

We, the People, are Mad as Hell will no longer vote for candidates who do not stand for, nor understand the importance of the Constitution; this should be taken as notice to all elected officials. We will not allow our rights being trampled on. We will not stand for our futures and our children's futures being washed away. We will not stand for further deceit from our elected officials. We are keeping track of all voting records with respect to the current elected officials, yourself included, and we will make this information available to every American citizen so that they may make an informed decision based upon the facts and not just expensive smear campaigns.

We, the people, are Mad as Hell tired of the supposed fight between political parties. We, now realize that both have failed us as a whole. We will no longer make our voting decisions based upon what political party the candidates are affiliated with. We, will no longer choose between the lesser of two evils.

We, the people, are Mad as Hell with Washington's plan to throw $14 TRILLION of our
Money at failed bankers, brokers, insurers and automakers.

We, the People, are Mad as Hell with Washington spendthrifts who are exploding the
National debt and burdening our children for decades to come…

We, the People, are Mad as Hell over insane corporate bailouts that can only
Guarantee this crisis will cut far deeper and last far longer than necessary…

We, the People, are Mad as Hell of Big Government taking over the banking and financial institutions, the automobile business,  energy, healthcare, and even the food business--down to the smallest backyard, homegrown garden--that Corporatism is plotting to plunder.


Whereas, by requirement of the Constitution for the United States of America, Art. 6 Sec.3, all elected or appointed individuals: Federal and State, City and County elected or appointed individuals shall be bound by an Oath or Affirmation.

Whereas, all elected or appointed individuals: Federal and State, City and County elected or appointed individuals are only official when they are acting under Art. 6 Sec.3 of the Constitution for the United States of America.

Whereas, all official federal elected or appointed individuals are acting under color of law and color of office if they hold an office under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 3331.

Whereas, all State, City, County elected or appointed individuals are acting under color of law and color of office if they hold an office under their State Constitution and Statues laws for the required Lawful Oath of Office.

Whereas, all Federal, State, City and County elected or appointed individuals: do solemnly swear (or affirm) that the elected or appointed individual will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that the elected or appointed individual will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that the elected or appointed individual take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that the elected or appointed individual will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which the elected or appointed individual are about to enter. So help me God.''

Whereas, Oaths of office are usually a statement of loyalty to a constitution or other legal text, as well as an oath to the state or religion the office holder will be serving. It is often considered treason or a high crime, or perjury to betray a sworn oath of office. (Title 18 U.S.C. §1621 and 5 U.S.C Sec. 8312. Conviction of certain offenses).

Whereas, violating the Oath of Office, under Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1986, that failure to extend or protect any inalienable and Natural rights secured by the above named Constitutions and failure to correct any violations or Infringements of said Natural or inalienable rights brought to the people attention is a civil rights violation actionable against the people under Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1985 as a cause of action and under Title 42, Sec. 1983 as a right of action.

Whereas, under U.S.C. Title 18 Sec. 241 - 242 all elected or appointed individuals Federal, State, City and County officials, "Whoever, under color of any law or color of office, ... willfully subjects any person ... to the deprivation of any rights ... protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States ... shall be fined ... or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

Whereas, any further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions, breach, encroachment, violation, infraction, contravention, intrusion, break, ban, or quantity of arms or ammunition shall constitute a violation on the Oath of Office; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force that are repugnant to Natural or Inalienable rights, the Constitution including the first ten of Bill of Rights shall also constitute a violation of the Oath of Office.

That this declaration shall serve as notice and demand to the federal government, as the agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of its constitutionally delegated powers.

Signed: Gary De Capua, C.R.T.F. President of Northern Nevada

Check here (104th vote) to see the Anti-Constitutionalist Representaives that violated their Oath of Office. Each one should be removed from office for Perjury, (Title 18 U.S.C. §1621).

JOIN United States Justice Foundation

What is the C.R.T.F.?
C.R.T.F. are people concerned about the erosion of Constitutional Government, i.e.,  
The Bill Of Rights, and the increased use of police powers to facilitate that abuse.

Our Goal
Our goal is to offer ongoing classes to our members on the subject of, but not limited to inalienable rights; redress of grievance; the use of administrative means; concerning the Constitution of The United States of America; State Constitution; the Bill of Rights, Court Watchers, and much more.

Our primary mission is to provide our members and the citizenry with the tools by which to redress those abuses of power.  Assuring that government be as accountable as its citizens.
C.R.T.F. is committed to providing education and information through the use of a in-house law library, access to Internet, and ongoing classes in various aspects of the laws, codes and regulations.

The C.R.T.F. are not lawyers, and the C.R.T.F. will not give legal advice...  Our goal is to assist people in learning what their options are if their civil rights are violated !
Mission 2

Maybe we should start forming chapters or cells in an
effort to reconstitute your state militias, per the logic of Devvy Kidd
and Dr. Edwin Vieira.
Contact Gary
Join us! For more information, contact us via e-mail at: (COPY AND PASTE INTO YOUR MAIL SERVER) [email protected]
Or call at 775 232-5049
Help support the CRTF join and become a member, or support by donations.
United We Stand, Divided We Fall
Send donations to:
Gary De Capua
1512 Carlin St.
Reno, Nevada 89503

Learn to protect your rights

The material here is solely for educational and informational purposes. It is not intended and should not be construed as legal advice. The CRTF dose not advocate disobedience to any laws. For legal advice consult an attorney.
Bill of Rights Enforcement
The C.R.T.F. is a nonprofit Group.
Essay from a Patriot
We Lynched Lady Liberty
He Says We're Good Little Patriots
 Sergei Borglum Hoff
What impact, will the transformational 2006 Congressional
Election have on Second Amendment rights?
Here are the top Anti-Constitutionlist that will and have, infringed on your 'Bill of Rights'
House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi (F-rated by GOA) is a charter member
of the most extreme wing of the party she now leads. As the person
who controls what bills come to the floor, Pelosi will be unable to
say "No" to the appeals for more gun control by the likes of Sarah
Brady and her congressional allies.
Mr. Grossman quotes Sarah Brady that all Congress
people who do not vote her way consist of the "the cowardly lions and the ones without a brain."
The Speaker's strongest House ally in the push for more gun control is long-time Democrat anti-gun activist John Conyers, the likely Chairman of the Judiciary Committee.
Almost all bills related to the Second Amendment will pass through Conyers' committee. The new Chairman, an extremist who advocates a total handgun ban, will control the schedule of the committee as well as which bills come up for committee vote.
The situation in the Senate may be worse,  the expected new Senate Majority will be F-rated Harry Reid (NV) and the probable incoming Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee would be
GOA F-rated Pat Leahy of Vermont
From there it really goes downhill.
The rest of the Democrats currently on the committee make up the Who's Who of the anti-gun movement:
* Ted Kennedy (MA), the mouthpiece for Sarah Brady in the Senate;
* Joe Biden (DE), who chaired the Judiciary Committee when the Brady bill passed in 1993, and who said at that time, famously, "The public and the Congress have spoken unequivocally, and I don't care what a minority wants;"
* Herb Kohl (WI), author of the "Gun Free Zones Ban;"
* Dianne Feinstein (CA), author of the so-called "Assault Weapons" ban;
* Russ Feingold (WI), democrat lead sponsor of so-called campaign finance reform;
* Charlie Schumer (NY), lead sponsor of the 1993 Brady law; and,
* Dick Durbin (IL), one of the most outspoken gun control zealots in the senate.
Gun owners should look twice at the above list. Most or all of these members will remain on the Judiciary Committee when the new Congress convenes in January, and will help shape American gun laws for at least the next two years.
Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
Click here to join TheRevolutionaryCoalition
Click to join TheRevolutionaryCoalition

Gamefly Game Rental

"With Liberty And Justice For All" - Original Videos

Get Studio Dubs directly from Civil Rights Task Force
Founding Fathers information