FAIR WARNING NOTICE TO ALL Anti-Constitutionalist.
PROTECTED UNDER THE 1ST AMENDMENT
REDRESS OF GRIEVANCE
“Under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241, 242, its is a criminal offense to act willfully and under color of Law to deprive a person of rights protected by the Constitution or Law of the United States” Kelley v. Johnson, 425 U.S. 238,
244-49, 96 S.Ct. 1440, 1444-46, 47 L.Ed.2d 708 (1976) U.S. v. Lanier 520 US 259
28 U.S.C. Sec. 113; In suites against state officers. 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983; In suits against federal officers.
Please read the following
Tuesday, April 17, 2001, Rep. Virgil Goode ( I-VA) has introduced a bill, H.R. 1455
, also was reintroduced in Jan 08, 2003 as H.R. 276
to repeal the onerous Lautenberg gun ban which was signed into law in 1996 as part of TREASURY-POSTAL omnibus appropriation bill
. This gun ban that was named after its author, Sen. Frank Lautenberg.
The bills failed two times due to a lack of interest in the House and Senate, and the unconcerned betrayal on the "Oath of Office" i.e., Bills of Attainder, Ex post facto law; that are in the Constitution for both federal and state as powers denied to the federal government See Article 1, Sec. 9, CL3. U.S. Constitution.. and the States, See Article 1, Section 10. (Details below)
Lautenberg's gun ban disarmed people for “Life” for offenses that include pushing, shoving or, in some cases, even yelling at a family member. The broad language is so expansive that unsuspecting parents have lost their 2nd Amendment Right, for SIMPLY using legitimate corporal punishment.
Ex post facto law
means, after the fact
. Senator Frank Lautenberg, who proposed the amendment, however, has argued that the provision is not being applied in violation of the ex post facto clause of the Constitution. The law does not impose additional punishment upon persons convicted prior to the effective date, but merely regulates the future possession of firearms on or after the effective date, (This is the invention of the LEGALESE LIARS.. (What part of "No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law" do they not UNDERSTAND
The punishment is INFRINGING ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT.
The founding fathers new that there would be government officials such as Lautenberg that would be enacting arbitrary or vindictive legislation to subvert the Constitution for his own political agenda. That's why the framers added the Prohibition clause in the Constitution. Lautenberg swore to uphold the Constitution and he LIED!!!
As did the Clinton administration: These people are the Anti-Constitutionalist.
The Lautenberg gun ban is in violation of Article I, Sec. 9, CL.3 (Powers Denied to Congress) Ex Post Facto Law.
Ex post facto law are specifically banned by the constitution, those who initiated this law, voted for it, passed it, and signed it into existence as
Law. ALL KNEW or should have known they were overstepping their limited authority and jurisdiction when they conspired to deprive, violate and restrain our Liberty interest in our constitutionally guaranteed right to be free from congress imposing ex post facto laws. It is also in violation of the 10th Amendment and the 14th Amendment.
Those who voted and signed it into law are in violation of Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States of America, it reads;
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislature, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States, shall be bound by Oath of Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall never be required as a Qualification to and Office of public Trust under the United States.
The Preamble to the Bill of Rights
[This is a note is from Dr. Linda Thompson of the American Justice Federation].
The MOST IMPORTANT PART of the Bill of Rights -- the PREAMBLE which tells SPECIFICALLY that the Bill of Rights was to make sure the government knew it was limited to the powers stated in the Constitution and if it didn't, the amendments were rights of the people the government cannot infringed on.
Our revisionist historians and LEGALESE LIARS ALWAYS leave this off the Constitution!!!
Effective December 15, 1791
Articles in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
The conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution.
The first ten amendments are "declaratory and restrictive clauses". This means they supersede all other parts of our Constitution and restrict the powers of our Constitution.
There are people in this country that do not want you to know that these two sentences ever existed. For many years these words were "omitted" from copies of our Constitution. Public and private colleges alike have based their whole interpretation of our Constitution on the fraudulent version of this text. Those corrupt individuals have claimed that the amendments can be changed by the will of the people. By this line of reasoning the amendments are open to interpretation. This is a clever deception. The Bill of Rights is separate from the other amendments. The Bill of Rights is a declaration of restrictions to the powers of our Constitution. The Bill of Rights restricts the Constitution. The Constitution restricts the powers of government. The deception is that the government can interpret the all of the amendments and the Constitution itself. Without the presence of the Preamble to the Bill of Rights this may be a valid argument.
End the deception.
Please contact your Representative and Senator
to cosponsor H.R. 276
to repeal this unconstitutional Lautenberg gun ban law. H.R. 276 will help restore our Guarantee protect right of the 2nd Amendment.
This message is brought to you by the Civil Rights Task Force of Nevada. For information call 787-8920 or visit our web page at http://www.civil-rights-task-force.info
Check here (104th vote
) to see the Representatives that violated their Oath of Office. Each one should be removed from office for Perjury, (Title 18 U.S.C. §1621).
Civil Rights Task Force of Nevada; Protecting the Bill of Rights. Fighting aginst the Anti-Constitutionalist.